Menu

Articles

Policy Exclusions – General Applicability of Exclusions Embedded Within Policy Extensions

We discuss whether policy exclusions set out in certain extension clauses have any impact on other extension clauses. Particularly, we will make reference to the English decisions of London International Exhibition Centre v RSA Insurance Plc & Ors [2023] EWHC 1481 (Comm) (“EXCEL v RSA”) and the China Taiping arbitral award issued by Lord Mance.

IN MEMORIAM OF ADRIAN TAN

Mr. Adrian Tan Gim Hai, President of the Law Society of Singapore, sadly passed away on Saturday 8 July 2023. I had the privilege and pleasure of working with Adrian between 2012 and 2019 and would like to say a few words in honour of the great man that we have lost....

Warranty Clauses in Insurance Policies – What are the Consequences for Breach of Warranty?

Warranties contained within insurance policies are powerful weapons of choice in the arsenal of defences available to insurers. Conventionally, warranties reference statements made or answers given by the policyholder in the proposal form, which forms part of the contract of insurance. That said, additional warranties (or clauses purporting to be warranties) may also appear in the general conditions of insurance policies when the policy is issued to the insured.

Determining the ‘Proximate Cause’ of Loss / Damage – Lessons from Allianz v University of Exeter [2023] EWHC 630 and Leyland Shipping v Norwich Union [1918] AC 350

The cover provided, or not provided, by all risks policies often turns on the proximate (or dominant) cause of the damage for which the cover is sought. That is because some causes of damage, such as faulty design or defective workmanship, may be excluded whereas other causes, such as poor operation or natural perils, may be covered. This gives rise to complex disputes as to which of a number of competing causes is the proximate cause of damage.

Anupam Mittal v Westbridge Ventures II [2023] SGCA 1 – One Step Forward or Two Steps Back?

As a dispute resolution hub, the Singapore Courts often considers arbitration-related issues. In Anupam Mittal v Westbridge Ventures II Investment Holdings [2023] SGCA 1 (“Anupam”), the Court of Appeal clarified that – pre-award stage – arbitrability of commercial disputes is determined by the proper law of the arbitration agreement and the law of the seat. Yet, deciding on the proper law may not be entirely straightforward. We share our insights below.

The Oscars. The Legal Guides and Directories. And Other Works of Fiction.

The annual film industry award ceremony, also known as the Oscars, is, with a nod to Will Smith, in full swing. And so is the back slapping and “humble bragging” that dominates LinkdIn and other social media platforms at this time of year as the legal directories publish their “rankings”. But is timing and commercially driven narcissism all they have in common? And should they both be nominated in the categories for best special effects, or make up?